Wednesday, May 6, 2026
Home Blog Page 864

2020 NECO, Common Entrance Exams For October 5, 17 – FG

0

The Federal Government has announced that the 2020 Senior Secondary School Certificate Examinations for SSS3 pupils organised by the National Examination Council (NECO) will start October 5 and end November 18.

It also said the 2020 National Common Entrance Examination will hold on October 17.

This was announced by Emeka Nwajiuba, Minister of State for Education, according to a statement signed by Ben Goong, Director, Press and Public Relations, Federal Ministry of Education, on Wednesday.

“Registration for NECO (SSCE) which is ongoing will end on the 10th of September 2020 and there shall be no extension for registration whatsoever.

“The National Common Entrance Examination (NCEE) which is a one-day examination for intending applicants into Unity Colleges (JSS1) will run in between the Senior Secondary School Examinations i.e. on Saturday, 17th October 2020,” the statement read.

The ministry also stated that the Basic Education Certificate Examinations for JSS 3 pupils also organised by NECO would commence August 24 and end September 7.

It also said the National Business and Technical Examination Board examination would commence on September 21 and end on October 15.

“The minister, therefore, directed all examination bodies to release details of their examination timetables in the next seven days,” the statement added.

Schools in the country have been shut since March due to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

Saudi Arabia appoints three female cultural attachés for first time

0

Saudi Arabia has appointed six cultural attaches, three of which are women, marking the first time women have been named to the diplomatic post, the Saudi Gazette reported on Sunday.

The Kingdom’s Minister of Education Dr. Hamd al-Sheikh appointed Dr. Amal Fatani as the Saudi Arabian cultural attaché to the United Kingdom, Dr. Fahdah al-Sheikh as the Kingdom’s representative in Ireland and Dr. Youssra al-Jazairi as the acting cultural attaché in Morocco.

This is the first time women have been named to this position, and they will work to build relations and strengthen cultural partnerships between the Kingdom and their assigned countries.

“The minister’s decisions are aimed to enhance the Kingdom’s educational and cultural presence at the international level, activate areas of joint cooperation, exchange scientific and research experiences, and coordinate scholarships for students to study in the Kingdom, supervising scholarship students abroad and facilitating their educational journey and investing their abilities to serve the country and participate in its future development,” the Saudi Gazette reported.

Other appointees include Dr. Ahmed al-Fareih who will serve as the cultural attaché in Egypt, Dr. Issa al-Romaih who will represent Saudi Arabia in Kuwait, and Dr. Saad al-Shabana who will be the Kingdom’s attaché in Kuwait.

The appointment of women to this post is in line with the Kingdom’s efforts to further boost female empowerment and increase the percent of women in the workforce.

Saudi Arabia will aim to provide jobs for 1 million Saudi Arabian women by 2030 as part of its Vision 2030 plan.

Source: https://muslimnews.com.ng/

JUDGMENT: [Compulsory Retirement] Industrial Court awards N75m damages against Nigerian Army

0

The President of the National Industrial Court, His Lordship, Hon. Justice Benedict Kanyip, PhD has nullified the compulsory retirement of Captain Benedict Olusoji Akanni (Rtd) by the Nigerian Army through a letter dated 22nd June 2017, ordered the Nigerian Army to pay Captain Olusoji the sum of N75 Million only being general damages for loss of expectation in his chosen career, training and psychological trauma suffered as a result of the arbitrary and illegal action of the Army within 30 days.

The Court held that the refusal of the Nigerian Army to restore the claimant to his employment as ordered by the Court of Appeal shattered the claimant’s expectations that no party is allowed in law to pick and choose which part of a judgment or court order to comply with.

From facts, the claimant- Rtd. Captain Olusoji had submitted that he was commissioned as a Lieutenant and was promoted to the rank of a Captain in 1997, that being the Administrative Officer in charge of the store, an incident of theft occurred and was charged to the General Court Martial on counts of stealing and conspiracy to steal; acquitted on the allegations of stealing but found guilty of conspiracy to steal and as a result, he was demoted from the rank of Captain to Second Lieutenant, and compulsorily retired him with effect from 10th April 2000.

Furthermore, he approached the Court of Appeal for redress, and on 8th July 2016 in its judgment, Court of Appeal set aside the conviction, sentence, demotion of the rank of the claimant and also set aside the judgment of the General Court Martial, ordered that he should be reinstated into the Nigerian Army, restore his rank and also should not suffer any disadvantage in his seniority in the said rank as a result of the trial.

Furthermore, the 1st, 2nd and 3rd defendants disobeyed and disregarded the order of the Court of Appeal by restoring him merely to the rank of Captain and immediately compulsorily retired him with effect from 10th April 2000 without any further benefit that that he filed the action after series of attempts to ensure that the judgment was complied with.

In defence, 1st to 3rd defendants -the Nigerian Army, the Nigerian Army Council and Chief of Army Staff submitted that in obedience to the decision of the Court of Appeal, the Nigerian Army immediately restored to the claimant his rank as a Captain, gave the directive for payment of his entitlements and retired him from the Nigerian Army that the claimant has not placed anything, both in his pleadings and evidence before the Court, to establish how his compulsory retirement was “based on a criterion that never existed” that the claimant does not need any Court order to his entitlements as a Captain.

In reply, the claimant’s learned counsel submitted that that had the 1st to 3rd defendants obeyed the judgment of the Court of Appeal, the claimant would not suffer any disadvantage in rank that as it stands today, the claimant has remained stagnated in the rank of Captain since the year 1997 that it ought to have proceeded further on the strength of the Court of Appeal judgment and accelerated the promotion of the claimant to the rank of Brigadier as at 22nd June 2017 that claimant’s aspirations and wishes to serve the country have been truncated; and has been diligent in his quest to correct the wrong he has suffered from the defendants urged the court to grant the reliefs sought.

Learned Counsel to the defendants also averred that the use of the phrase “the said rank” is indicative of the fact that the Court of Appeal concerned itself with the issues for determination which did not include promotion to the rank of a Brigadier General. That it would, therefore, be in the interest of justice for the Court to align itself with the Court of Appeal in holding that promotion to the rank of Brigadier did not form part of the decision of the Appellate Court.

After careful evaluation of the submissions and arguments of both counsel, the presiding Judge, Justice Benedict Kanyip held that it’s wrong and unlawful for the defendants to choose to restore the rank of the claimant as Captain but not his employment as an officer of the Nigerian Army.

“By this act, the defendants chose a part of the decision of the Court of Appeal to comply with but not the other. No party (and that includes the defendants) is allowed in law to pick and choose which part of a judgment or court order to comply with.

On the prayer for accelerated promotion to full Brigadier, the Court held that other than the evidence of the 1st to 3rd defendant’s witness to the effect that promotion in the Army is done after being 5 years on a rank, there is no evidence before the Court as to the other parameters/requirements for promotion from the rank of Captain to any other higher rank, the Court cannot ascertain whether the claimant would have been qualified and so entitled to any promotion from the rank of Captain had he remained in actual employment of especially the 1st defendant.

“There is no gainsaying that the refusal of especially the 1st defendant to restore the claimant to his employment shattered the claimant’s expectations. And this Court has acknowledged in several cases that expectation interest is recoverable by an employee against his employer.

“The disobedience of the defendants to the Court of Appeal decision, which disobedience is the failure of the defendants to restore the claimant to his employment as an Officer of the 1st defendant must accordingly be recompensed especially in terms of the failed expectations of the claimant in that regard.

Lastly, the court dismissed other monetary claims on interest on entitlement benefits and legal fee for lack of proof.

https://nicnadr.gov.ng/

Again, Dele Adesina seeks NBA Election cancellation, calls for new Election

0

Former General Secretary and a candidate in the just concluded Nigerian Bar Association National Officers Election, Deacon Dele Adesina, SAN, has maintained that the 2020 NBA Election was a Sham.

In a petition to the Body of Trustees of NBA, Mr Adesina described the election as a Case of Classical Electronic Fraud which must be cancelled.

He noted that well meaning members of the Bar had prior to the election raised concerns about the flawed process. Adesina further stated that he was one of the builders of the Association before “some of the god-fathers who are plunging the NBA into avoidable crisis today ever became involved in the affairs of the Association”.

Recall that Mr. Adesina had earlier petitioned the Electoral committee of NBA on Friday, 31st July, 2020.

According to him, the data in the election results monitoring site was programmed to give a premeditated result thus disenfranchising many eligible voters.

Equity News reported that Olumide Akpata defeated Deacon Dele Adesina (SAN) and managing Partner of SPA & co., Dr. Ajibade (SAN) to emerge as the winner of the Presidential election.

Read the full petition below:

Sunday, 2 August 2020

The Chairman,
Body of Trustees,
Nigerian Bar Association
C/o: 10A, Ilabere Street,
Off Macpherson Road,
Off Bourdillon Road,
Ikoyi, Lagos State.

Attention: Mr. Olisa Agbakoba, SAN

Dear Learned Brother Silk,

RE: THE NIGERIAN BAR ASSOCIATION 2020 NATIONAL OFFICERS ELECTION: A CASE OF CLASSICAL ELECTRONIC FRAUD, ILLEGAL AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS: CALL FOR CANCELLATION AND A NEW ELECTION CONDUCTED FOR THE NIGERIAN BAR ASSOCIATION (NBA).

INTRODUCTION:

My fraternal greetings and profound respect to the Chairman and other members of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Board of Trustees. I send this Petition to you with all sense of responsibility and in appreciation of the motto of the NBA which is – “Promoting the Rule of Law” – with a clarion call that you rise up and save our beloved Association. In writing this Petition, please I beseech you to have attention to the following fundamental observations as regards my person:

a) I, Dele Adesina SAN, by the Grace of God have had the privilege of joining others to build the NBA before some of the god-fathers who are plunging the NBA into avoidable crisis today ever became involved in the affairs of the Association. As a past Chairman of NBA Ikeja Branch, past General Secretary of the Association, a Life Member of the National Executive Committee and a Life Member of the Distinguished Body of Benchers, I can lay claim to being one of the builders of the Association. Consequently, I will hate to see it destroyed. My pedigree will confirm that I don’t pursue anything at all cost and my actions regarding the NBA are driven by the interest of the Association.

In 2008, in the interest of the Association, I stepped down from contesting for the Office of President of NBA in favour of another candidate who became elected unopposed in order to address and possibly stop the monetisation of NBA elections. In 2014, I contested and lost to Augustine Alegeh, SAN. Nevertheless, I congratulated him that very night when he visited my hotel room in the company of my brother – Olumide Akpata – and I supported his administration throughout his tenure. I am writing this Petition because of my heartfelt desire to redeem the image and integrity of our Association that is consistently being beaten and battered every two years by electoral fraud.

b) The NBA as a generational Association is supposed to be and is presumably composed by men and women of honour, honesty and integrity. These ethical values have to be exhibited by the Association at all times. Please recognise that these ethical values are not just in words only, they are in consistency of actions.

It is against the foregoing background that I am compelled to present this Petition to the Trustees with a view to letting you know that the conduct of the NBA Election of July 29-30, 2020 is not only a violation of all the known values of our Profession but is also capable of bringing disgrace and dishonour to the Association and the Legal Profession in general and I will be urging your Body to take a stand with respect, promptly.

PRE-ELECTION CONCERNS AND AGITATIONS:
Upon noticing anomalous situations in the process, some candidates and members of the Association raised concerns about the flawed process leading to the election. Some of the concerns are contained in the following correspondences to ECNBA:

a) Letter to the Chairman of the ECNBA dated July 7, 2020 by Mr. Ade OkeayaInneh, SAN; Mr. Ayuli Jemide, Vice Chairman, NBA SBL; Prof. Chidi Anselm Odinkalu and Mrs. Barbara Omosun calling for postponement of the Election in order to address disenfranchisement issues.

b) Letter dated July 9, 2020 to Mr. Tawo E. Tawo, SAN, the Chairman of the ECNBA, by Lawal Pedro, SAN, Director-General of Dele Adesina Campaign Team, raising concerns over the management of the electoral process. The concerns raised included: inflation and injection of names into the Voters List of Abuja Branch, illegal use of Stamp and Seal payment as a basis for compilation of Voter’s Register, lack of information regarding the Service Provider and the Election portal, the security of the NBA Website and the serial violations of the provisions of the NBA Constitution.

c) Statement by Dr. Foluke Dada, 2nd Vice President of the NBA dated July 15, 2020 where she stated inter alia that: “as recently as yesterday, July 6 2020, members from across the Nation have been clamouring for the postponement of the 2020 NBA National Elections for reasons varying from the lack of transparency, lack of a trustworthy web-platform secured to ensure the integrity of the Elections.”

d) Letter dated July 20, 2020 to the ECNBA by Mr. Olumide Akpata drawing attention to the “urgent need to avert the looming disenfranchisement of voters and possible manipulation of the forth-coming 2020 NBA Election”. Mr. Akpata’s letter further stated: “the lack of information regarding the specific modalities for the forth-coming election is quite disturbing… as of the date of writing this letter, the ECNBA has not informed me and I believe any other candidate, of the technology it intends to use in the elections, how that technology works, who will provide it, how secure it is against possible hacks or manipulation (such as the ones that currently bedevil the NBA Portal). We have not seen any demonstration or test-run of the proposed technology and are therefore not able to ascertain that it would work at all, to say nothing of guaranteeing free, fair and transparent elections.” The fact that Mr. Olumide Akpata has now become the beneficiary of this flawed and manipulated process does not validate or make the flawed process acceptable.

e) Statement by Prof. Chidi Anselm Odinkalu dated July 21, 2020 and titled “How 2020 Elections of the NBA will be rigged.” It is striking to note that all these agitations, concerns and warnings were studiedly neglected and disregarded by the ECNBA.

THE ELECTION:
The Election in a most disgraceful, brazen and unconscionable manner was conducted in violation of the clear, express and unambiguous provisions of the Constitution of the NBA (2015 as amended). It was riddled with electronic fraud where the server used for the Election was loaded with predetermined data. It is significant to note that the system used for this election was said to have been registered the very day the election was to start and the MoU was signed on that same day. The appointment of the Service Provider was done solely by the President contrary to the provisions of Section 18 (2) of the NBA Constitution which obligates the ECNBA to engage the Service Provider for the Election. There was no opportunity to interrogate the System before the commencement of the Election in order to determine its vulnerability, security and capacity. The inability to deliver 14,000 notices to prospective voters 13 hours after the commencement of the Election was not only evidence of lack of capacity on the part of the System but also a clear disenfranchisement of these prospective voters. Therefore, the election failed to conform with the minimum principle of fairness and transparency.

1. Illegal Voters Register:
The Voters Register is the foundation of any and every election and as such, the compilation of the list must be undertaken with the utmost degree of openness and transparency. However, the Verified Voters’ Register used in the 2020 Election was a sham, illegal, doctored and manipulated.

a) Publication of Voters Register: By the provisions of Paragraph 1.3 (d) of the Second Schedule to the NBA Constitution, the Voters List must be made available to the Branches and the candidates not later than 28 days to the date of the Election. The Verified Voters List used for this instant Election was only released by the Electoral Committee of the Nigerian Bar Association (ECNBA) five (5) hours to the Election in violation of the constitutional provisions. This alone suffices to erode the basis of the entire election because the provisions of the NBA Constitution relating to publication of the voters register are couched in mandatory terms. By parity of reasoning, can the respected Trustees imagine a situation where INEC conducts elections and only publishes the voters register a few hours to the opening of polling and on the day of voting. I have made this comparison because NBA usually acts as an election monitor and I wonder what the stance of the NBA will be if such a scenario manifests in elections conducted by INEC.

b) Inaccurate and Flawed Voters Register: Upon the receipt of the Verified Voters List published about five (5) hours to the commencement of the 2020 NBA Election, my team and I after a painstaking perusal of the List observed that the List was manipulated, doctored and padded to achieve preconceived intentions and other grave errors of omission and commission including but not limited to the following:

i. 4,464 names of purported Lawyers without Branches ascribed to any of them from Serial Number 25171 to 29635. This List obviously provided cover for harvested voters without Branches;

ii. 86 names of Lawyers under the category “International Diaspora” from Serial Number 12182 to 12268, a clear violation of the provisions of the Constitution of the NBA. International Diaspora as a Branch is unknown to the NBA Constitution. See Section 4 of the NBA Constitution, 2015, as amended.

iii. Inflation of the List of some Branches. For instance, Obollo-Afor Branch had only 39 names from Serial Number 30424 to 30462 on the Final List for Verification. Strangely, this increased to 662 on the Verified Voters

List published on the date of the Election;
iv. Deletion/removal of Names of many Members from the Final List. Example: Ikeja, Ibadan, Enugu, Ife, Ado-Ekiti and many others have their number of voters substantially reduced without any explanation whatsoever or howsoever;

v. Many Members names were omitted from the List and many names found their way to Branches other than their own Branch. These facts were admitted by the ECNBA in their Statement No. 19 where they stated among others: “the ECNBA received complaints of members being placed in Branches other than their own. The situation is regretted… In respect of omitted names, please see the ECNBA
Statement No. 018.”

c) Use of Stamp and Seal payment by the National Secretariat/ ECNBA as a basis for the Compilation of the Voters List: According to the ECNBA Statement No. 12, the ECNBA used Stamp and Seal List to compile the Voters List. This is totally contrary to the clear, express and unambiguous provision of the NBA Constitution which provides for the eligibility of members to vote and be voted for. See Sections 4(1), 13(14) and 4(b) of the Constitution of the Nigerian Bar Association. The said provisions limit the factors for the qualification of voters to the payment of the pre-requisite Bar Practicing Fees and Branch Dues.

There is no mention of the use of a Stamp and Seal List to compile the List of Eligible Voters. Consequently, the use of the said Stamp and Seal List as ECNBA has done is a gross perversion and violation of the clear, express and unambiguous provisions of the Constitution of the Nigerian Bar Association. Even more so is the fact that the use of stamp and seal list led directly to the exclusion of lawyers who pay their practicing fees and branch dues in a timely fashion but are not in active practice such as to require stamps and seal. It must be understood and this is made clear by the Constitution of the NBA that payment for Stamp and Seal without more does not make anyone a member of any Branch of the Association.

d) Final Voters List: As rightly noted by the ECNBA in their Statement No. 12, the Constitution of the NBA provides a deadline before which the list of eligible voters must be released to the public and the candidates. In this instance, the list of voters eligible for the election was only released by the ECNBA, Five hours before the election itself commenced, in gross violation of the constitutional requirement of 28 days before the election. See Paragraph 1.3

(d) of the Second Schedule to the Constitution. Much more disconcerting is the fact that the names of several people, who fulfilled all the constitutional requirements of payment of practicing fees and branch dues and undertook the verification process further to which their names were included in the earlier ‘Final Voters List’ issued by the ECNBA, were wrongly excluded from the List of Eligible Voters released only hours to the election.

2. Loading of Predetermined Data and Disenfranchisement:
Our I.C.T. Consultants informed us that though the voting site might have appeared credible on the surface as a decoy, it is apparent to state that the data uploaded to the site was programmed and preconfigured to achieve a premeditated result in an obvious case of data diddling. Right from the outset of the election and up till the end of same, all the candidates virtually maintained the same percentage of votes relative to each other and the total votes cast. This fact alone is indicative of the possibility of a system which was programmed towards a predetermined result. A close examination of the recorded result at different timelines shows percentage movement of the Presidential Candidates as 54%, 23% and 21% with little or no variation. The system was obviously programmed to distribute votes at either +1 or – 1 throughout the 24 hour period. According to the Interim Report of our Technical Team, “statistically, the voting result showed no randomness of any sort, which raises the question of whether there was no tampering of votes.” Besides, about forty percent of voters could not vote as they were not sent with the links to do so. Again, ECNBA admitted this fact by stating that notices were delivered in batches what ought to be delivered at once to all prospective voters.Does this not call into question the capacity of the portal used for this election? Out of about 29,000 prospective voters, about 14,000 were not able to vote by the reasons stated above. As if that is not enough, instead of the recorded system stating that Mr. Olumide Akpata leads by 54% barely from about 20 minutes after voting started, the system stated that Olumide Akpata is winning by 54% in order to hoodwink and bias the mind of the voters in an election that is supposed to be free and fair. No doubt, everything considered showed an unholy alliance and collaboration between the ‘winning’ candidate, the leadership under whom the election was held and perhaps the ECNBA. Several members of many Branches of the NBA including but not limited to Ikeja, Ibadan, Enugu, Ilorin and Kano Branches of the NBA were starved of voting links for the election.

3. Use of Service Provider(s) to develop the Election Portal and manage the Electoral Process:
Throughout the process leading to the Election, there was no information from the ECNBA regarding the Service Provider who would conduct and manage the electoral process in respect of accreditation, voting, computation of votes, and declaration of results, such as to enable the parties interrogate in order to determine its vulnerability, security or capacity to have confidence or otherwise in the system. This is very much unlike the previous elections where the disclosure was timely made to enable the candidates and the general public to interrogate the process and ensure that the election is not only fair but also seen to be fair. In this instance, the candidates were deprived of this opportunity and this deprivation robbed the candidates the opportunity to raise any and all desires or relevant issues to the process before the process was concluded. It even appears that the ECNBA went out of its way to deceive the contestants on the way and manner the election was going to be held as, a few days before, they released an infographic informing the electorate how to vote, which stated that the election was to be held on the ‘NBA Membership Portal,’ only to resile from this position during the only meeting held with all candidates by the ECNBA on Monday, 27th July, 2020. It is our contention that this failure was fundamental and it was deliberately designed to permit the ultimate manipulation of the electoral process. We know as a fact that in 2016 the I.T. company appointed for the election made two (2) representations to the National Executive Committee (NEC) – first in February 2016 and second in May 2016 – about what they were going to do and how they will do it
before the election. In 2018, the then President and Electoral Committee held several meetings with the candidates including the out-going President and their I.T. consultants. Some of these meetings were attended by past Presidents and past General Secretaries of the Bar. These meetings provided not only the candidates but also members of NEC the opportunity to interrogate the process. There is hardly any doubt that in this present instance the ECNBA took a deliberate decision to withhold the identity of the Service Provider involved in the process.

Besides, the appointment of the Service Provider was shrouded in secrecy and made single-handedly by the President of the NBA without the knowledge or approval of the National Executive Committee or the ECNBA and contrary to the provisions of Section 18 (2) of the NBA Constitution. Furthermore, the ECNBA never briefed NEC throughout the pendency of their assignment from March 12, 2020 when they were appointed till July 29-30, 2020 when they conducted the election contrary to the practice and convention that we have had since 2016. No briefing, no report and no demonstration to members of NEC.

Some of the protests received from different Branches in the course of the election are as follows:
a) Many members, particularly from the Branches in the West, like Ikeja, Ibadan and Ado-Ekiti, did not receive the link to vote and some of those who received the link could not vote. The same protest came from several Branches in the North, like Gombe, Katsina, Birnin-Kebbi, Yobe and Kano.
b) The same complaint was lodged vehemently by members of NBA Enugu Branch.
c) Several cases of disenfranchisement were reported by members whose names were not on the list. A Senior Advocate of Nigeria who contacted the helpline to lodge his complaint was told that it is because he did not have his SAN’s number. Query! Is SAN’s number a requirement?

ABDICATION OF DUTY BY THE ECNBA:
By the express provisions of Statement No. 013 issued by the ECNBA and titled “Travel Across the Country or to NBA Branches to canvass for Votes: Get Disqualified.”, the ECNBA prohibited aspirants from travelling to Branches to canvass for votes. Some candidates travelled from Lagos to Uyo, Port-Harcourt, Abuja, Bwari etc. in violation of this Guideline and the ECNBA for unexplainable reasons saw nothing, heard nothing and did nothing.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Mr. Chairman and Honourable Members of the Board of Trustees, with the greatest respect to the ECNBA and the NBA President, this election has been in violation of the Rule of Law and what the NBA stands for: it has breached the fundamental provisions of the NBA Constitution itself in material particulars; in areas where the constitution of our Association applies the use of the words “must” and “shall” to what must be done, including but not limited to publication of the Voters Register 28 days before election and appointment of Service Provider by ECNBA. The main objective of the NBA as entrenched in our Constitution is to uphold and defend the Rule of Law. Most humbly, an association that cannot and has not obeyed its own constitution or honoured mandatory provisions of the constitution relating to the conduct of its own election cannot pretend under any guise to defend or protect the Rule of Law in the country, or act as the bulwark against the breach of the Rule of Law or the Nation’s ground norm – the Constitution. The ECNBA is expected to be an independent body. Representations made by me to the ECNBA were very strangely responded to personally by the NBA President without any such response from the ECNBA which was the primary addressee of the complaints. The entire election looked like it was a personal show or project of the incumbent President including selection/appointment of service providers et al. Mr. Chairman, sir, what the NBA President did by comparison can be likened to a situation where the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria conducts a Presidential election, hijacked the constitutional responsibilities by assuming the duties and responsibilities of INEC, appointing Service Providers, nominating and paying those who would print ballot papers, warehousing the ballot boxes, providing INEC Server etc.

Mr. Chairman, sir, this Petition is not about Dele Adesina SAN; it is about protecting the heritage of our forebears and progenitors, the great founders and leaders of our Association, including your humble self. It is often said that one cannot give what he does not have (nemo dat quod non habet). In this connection, NBA will never be taken serious by Nigeria and Nigerians as well as other law associations outside our shores, including the International Bar Association (IBA) if these crass, abnormalities, illegalities and deliberate wholesale breach of our constitution are not redressed. Our dear Association must not be allowed to descend to opprobrium. We must not be made or subjected to a laughing stock.

CONCLUSION:
I have herein complained of both the process leading to the Election and the Election itself which show instances of lawlessness and gross violation of the NBA Constitution. Disregarding the law is worse than corruption. The end product of lawlessness is condemnation and destruction. I urge the members of the Board of Trustees of the NBA to intervene and right these wrongs and save the NBA from condemnation and destruction. I believe that leaders must do things right and/or ensure that things are done right. It is needless to say, Mr. Chairman and other members of the Board of Trustees of the NBA, that if the process is wrong, the product cannot be right. If the election process is wrongful and unconstitutional, the outcome must suffer the same fate and be cancelled. Since 2016 when this electronic voting system started, there have been consistent allegations of system manipulation and rigging which has resulted in litigations over NBA elections. As at today, a criminal action arising from the NBA Election of 2018 is still pending at the Federal High Court. This is a shame to all of us without exception. Patriotism must guide our aspirations and our conscience must always be our companion. The time has come to regain the integrity of the Nigerian Bar Association by putting an end to unconstitutional and fraudulent elections in our Association.

Thank you.
Yours faithfully,

Dele Adesina, SAN, FCIArb.
Cc:
i. Members, NBA Board of Trustees
ii. Past Presidents of NBA

MURIC faults WAEC timetable, seeks adjustment on Fridays exams

0

The Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC), has faulted the examination timetable recently released by the West African Examinations Council (WAEC) for the conduct of the 2020 West African Secondary School Certificate Examinations (WASSCE) scheduled to begin on Tuesday, 11th August 2020 for clashing with Jumu’ah prayers on Fridays.

The Islamic human rights advocacy group explained that its opposition against the new timetable which clashes with the period of Friday Jumu’ah prayers in which Muslim candidates were also expected to partake in the papers slated for the prayer hours.

MURIC’s Director, Professor Ishaq Akintola, said that the subjects fixed for the period of the Muslim Friday Jumu‘ah prayer for the 2020 WASSCE examination which begins next week Tuesday has very serious implications for Muslim students

Akintola, through a statement released to newsmen on Monday, alleged that with the clashing timetable, the examination body was making it impossible for Muslim youth to worship despite efforts made by the body to ensure the current challenges did not surface.

“WAEC is deliberately creating a wedge between young Muslims and the mosque. WAEC is making it impossible for Muslim youth to worship. The examination body is encroaching upon Allah-given fundamental rights of Muslim candidates to access freedom of religion as guaranteed by Section 38 (i) & (ii) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. At best, the examination body is reducing the chances of good performance among Muslim candidates.

“A quick glance at the timetable recently released by WAEC shows that there are at least three clashes between examination periods and Muslim prayers on Fridays: Management-in-Living (2 pm, Friday 14th August 2020); Literature-in-English (2 pm, Friday 21st August); Health Science (1.30 pm, Friday, 4th September).

“This timetable is exclusive, sectional, parochial, insensitive, and provocative. It is an invitation to anarchy. It is designed to cause pain to Muslim candidates. It is, therefore, the handiwork of sadists and anarchists. It smirks of anti-Muslim machinery oiled by the passion for hate and injustice.

“We are perturbed by WAEC’s recalcitrance. The fact that the examination body ignored the above advice shows that it deliberately targets Muslims for persecution. It inflicts unbearable psychological trauma on young Muslim candidates. It is unacceptable. This has to stop.

“There is also enough evidence that this is not the first time WAEC will fix examinations during the Muslim prayer period on Friday. MURIC’s struggle with WAEC over the Friday question is of great antiquity. Unfortunately, WAEC does not appear ready to learn from history.

“It was due to this constant occurrence that we took a proactive step two months ago by cautioning WAEC not to allow its timetable to clash with the Jumu‘ah period this year but the leopard refused to change its skin,” the statement read.

Akintola, however, urged the Federal Government and the Ministry of Education to wade into the matter and ensure the examination body adjust its timetable to give room for Friday prayers.

“Muslim candidates should not be blamed if they refuse to write an examination under duress. Any examination that infringes upon freedom of religion is ultra vires, unlawful, illegal, illegitimate, and unconstitutional. Candidates for such examinations acting alone or in conjunction with their parents have every right to use every lawful means to stop the examination.

“WAEC is therefore invited to take notice of impending action by Muslim candidates unless it adjusts its timetable to accommodate Muslim Jumu‘ah service during the coming examinations. Muslim candidates must be given three hours every Friday. This is non-negotiable. Nigerian Muslims will liberate themselves from slavery, serfdom, and religious apartheid if government is lackadaisical. The only thing MURIC opposes is violence,” the statement added.

Flour Mills finishes year with record 184% profit growth

0

Flour Mills of Nigeria Plc, Nigeria’s leading integrated food business and agro-allied Group, on Monday August 3 announced its audited 2019/20 financial results, showing remarkable growths in all three key segments of Food, Agro-Allied and Sugar.

The results
The Group’s revenues grew by 9 percent year-on-year (YoY) to N574 billion. Profit Before Tax (PBT) increased by 72percent (YoY) to N17.5 billion, whereas Profit After Tax increased by 184percent (YoY) to N11.4 billion.

Key highlights of the result showed Group Revenues was N574 billion, compared to N527 billion in 2018/19 Full year (9percent YoY growth); Profit Before Tax was N17.5 billion, compared to N10.2 billion in 2018/2019 (72percent YoY growth); Profit After Tax was N11.4 billion with a 184percent YoY growth. Proposed final dividend represents increase of 17percent to N1.40 for every ordinary share of 50 kobo. This is subject to shareholders’ approval at the company’s AGM.

Operational review
Despite prevailing economic headwinds and the difficult operating terrain of Apapa, the Group had a prosperous and successful year. In line with management’s strategy to continue to stimulate organic growth in all segments of the business, Agro-Allied division reached profitability in 2019/20 behind the consistent and focused investments that have been made in this locally sourced segment over the last few years. The Agro-allied segments saw strong profit growth in Oils and Fats and Proteins with Gross Profits more than doubling in both segments on an annual basis.

Our Food business recorded accelerated growths within the business-to-consumer (B2C) segments in line with projections, as our focus to improve customer experience saw the introduction of a range of new products and our strategic marketing and promotional activities to win over new market segments yielded the desired result.

Management speaks
Commenting on the result, Paul Gbededo, the Group Managing Director, said: “The 2019/20 financial year was a remarkable year for our Group and I am really pleased with the result. Our Profit Before Tax saw a remarkable increase of 72% to 17.5 billion Naira, while our Profit After Tax nearly tripled from 4.0 billion Naira last year to 11.4 billion Naira in the current year. This is partly attributable to the improved performance of our Agro Allied Businesses and in line with our strategy to continue to grow the wealth of our shareholders.”

He further stated: “We will remain focused on increasing operational efficiency within the group as we continue to implement our accelerated cost optimization plans across all businesses to ensure profitability in the new operating environment.”

Source: Business Day

[OSUN]: Oyetola approves N500m for pensions

0

Osun State Governor Adegboyega Oyetola has approved N500million for payment of entitlements to retirees on Contributory Pensions Scheme.

The approved sum covered the payment of contributory pensions to retired primary school teachers and local government workers, to the tune of N300 million, while N200 million was earmarked for retired workers in the civil service and parastatals.

Head of Service Dr. Festus Gboyega Oyebade said in a statement that “this gesture is part of the evidence of Governor Oyetola’s concern for the people’s welfare”, adding that the current administration would prioritise the welfare of serving and retired workers.

He said: “This gesture is evidence that the governor listens to the yearnings of the citizens. We are delighted and proud of his response to the needs of retirees, especially at this time COVID-19 pandemic is ravaging the world economy.

“The government under the leadership of Governor Oyetola is aware of the importance of pension to those who have retired. The governor’s consistent gesture validates his commitment to continue to cater for those who have served the state meritoriously.”

JUDGMENT: [Wrongful Termination] Industrial Court orders Microfinance Bank to pay former staff 18 Months’ salary as damages

0

The Presiding Judge, Portharcourt Judicial Division of the National Industrial Court, His Lordship, Hon. Justice Faustina Kola-Olalere has declared the employment termination of Mrs. Olufunke Sogbesan as wrongful, ordered UNAAB Microfinance Bank Limited to pay six months’ full salary in lieu of notice, and 18 months’ salary for general damages within 60 days.

The Court held that the termination of the Olufunke employment on ‘Restructuring and Reorganization’ is not of compliance with the terms and conditions of her employment.

From facts, the claimant- Olufunke Sogbesan had averred that she was a former employee of the UNAAB Microfinance Bank Ltd owned and operated by the Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta for a period of over 13 years with an unblemished record, that termination of her employment on the ground of restructuring and re-organization was contrary to the terms and conditions of her employment, submitted that she is entitled to be re-instated with the payment of all her accrued salaries, benefits and emoluments.

Learned counsel to Olufunke, Chinyere Stella Ogu (Mrs.), Oluwaseyi Olawumi (Mrs.)& Akeem Ijadu-Ola including Kehinde Olawumi had submitted that claimant is not liable to pay any staff loan to the Bank as Counter-Claimed that having frustrated the loan agreement by unlawfully terminating her employment thereby blocked her source of repayment of the loan that the Bank cannot turn around and demand for same, and further that the Claimant should be paid all her gratuity and will have more than sufficient fund to offset the balance of the said loan.

In defence, the defendants’ counsel E. Sarah Mark (Mrs.) submitted that the Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta is merely a co-owner of the Microfinance Bank that the claimant’s claim for monetization of 70 working days leave is not grantable because the relief is not provided for in the Bank Handbook neither is it provided for in the claimant’s letter of employment.

To the defendants’ counsel; counsel to the claimant did not refer to any document before the court on how he arrived at the gratuity calculations that it is not the duty of the court to go on a voyage of speculation and not entitle to reinstatement urged the Court to so hold.

Delivering judgment, the presiding Judge, Justice Kola-Olalere held that since Olufunke had accepted 2nd appointment without any complaint as ‘Offer of Permanent Appointment’ that the Microfinance Bank had completely taken over the appointment of the claimant from the University, struck out the name of University from the case.

“Furthermore, apart from her letter of 1st appointment that was issued by the 2nd defendant, nothing else links the claimant with the University. Her salaries were not paid by the University even her specific reliefs as endorsed on her complaint and pleaded in paragraph 27 of the Amended Statement of Facts are against the 1st defendant only, the claimant has no specific claim against the 2nd defendant.

“In the circumstances, I find and hold that the termination of the claimant’s employment on ‘Restructuring and Reorganization’ is not of compliance with the terms and conditions of her employment; it is, therefore, wrongful.

“Consequently, I hold that the claimant is entitled to payment of her six months’ full salary in lieu of notice in accordance with the terms of her employment. I direct that this is to be computed with the claimant’s last salary for October 2013 before her employment was determined on November 15, 2013.

“I further hold that since the claimant could not justify her claim for the monetization of the said accumulated 70days leave from the agreement between the parties, she is not entitled to the claim and the monetization of ₦338,176.77relief is accordingly dismissed.

“In the present labour jurisprudence, justice of this situation demands that more compensation in form of general damages should be paid to the claimant in this situation to ameliorate the loss of her job due to no fault of hers as required by the parties’ terms of employment. Even though this damage cannot be specifically calculated, it will be computed in the opinion of a reasonable man.

Justice Kola-Olalere also ordered the claimant to pay UNAAB Microfinance Bank the indebted sum of N244,894.35 balance of money received as a loan and declined interest claim that the agreed interest by parties on the loan is not known to the Court.

Source: https://nicnadr.gov.ng/

BREAKING: Shoprite to pull out of Nigeria

0

South Africa retail giant, Shoprite, has announced the commencement of a formal process to discontinue its operation in Nigeria.

Shoprite Holdings Limited made the announcement on Monday in its operational and voluntary trading update for the year ended on June 28, 2020. The multi-national retail group, which announced a 6.4 per cent increase (R156.9billion) in total sales of merchandise for the outgoing year despite the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, announced that it took the decision to discontinue its Nigeria operation “following approaches from various potential investors, and in line with our re-evaluation of the group’s operating model in Nigeria.” “The Board has decided to initiate a formal process to consider the potential sale of all, or a majority stake, in Retail Supermarkets Nigeria Limited, a subsidiary of Shoprite International Limited. As such, Retail Supermarkets Nigeria Limited may be classified as a discontinued operation when Shoprite reports its results for the year. Any further updates will be provided to the market at the appropriate time,” the report stated. While the company’s total sales of merchandise may be on the rise, it is struggling outside South Africa. According to the report, the non-South Africa supermarket operation of the company, excluding Nigeria, contributed a paltry 11.6 per cent to the group sales. Its non-South Africa sales also declined by 1.4 per cent in the year under review. The company blamed this decline on the lockdown announced in several African countries due to the coronavirus pandemic. “Second half constant currency sales growth of 6.3% was significantly impacted by lockdown regulations across the 14 African countries in which we trade. Lockdown restrictions pertaining to store closures; social distancing; transport restrictions; the movement of people; trading hours; workforce limitations and trade in alcohol impacted various regions to differing degrees at different times.” Shoprite opened its first store in Nigeria in December 2005 and now has a total of 26 stores across eight states in the country including Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. The company also claim to have employed more than 2,000 people in Nigeria, of which 99 per cent of them are Nigerians. Shoprite also claimed to have built more relationships with over 300 Nigeria suppliers, small businesses and farmers.

Source: Premiumtimesng.com

Ekiti workers begin three-day warning strike today

0

Workers in Ekiti State will on Monday (today) begin a three-day warning strike over welfare and other sundry issues.

This is as the 14-day ultimatum that organised Labour comprising Nigeria Labour Congress, Trade Union Congress and Joint Negotiating Council had issued to the state government expired in the midnight of Sunday, August 2.

Rising from a meeting in Ado Ekiti on Sunday, the labour said, “The warning strike called by the organised labour in Ekiti will commence on Monday, August 3”.

A statement by the state chairmen of the NLC, Kolapo Olatunde; TUC, Sola Adigun; and JNC, Kayode Fatomiluyi; and the secretaries of JNC, Gbenga Olowoyo; TUC, Kuloogun Lawrence; and NLC, Taiwo Akinyemi; entitled, ‘Strike! Strike!! Strike!!!,’ read, “No worker should go to work or listen to any directive from any quarters except from the leadership of the organised labour.”

According to them, their demands which they wanted the government to address as contained in the 14-day strike notice earlier given included “non-implementation of financial benefits arising from the letters of promotion given to all deserving workers from years 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019 and advancement and government’s decision to jettison the outstanding promotions for the years 2015, 2016 and 2017 and contemplating implementation of 2018 and 2019.”

Source: The Punch